<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IS THIS  MINNING STOCK JUST NUTS?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://investornuts.wordpress.com/2008/04/24/is-this-minning-stock-just-nuts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://investornuts.wordpress.com/2008/04/24/is-this-minning-stock-just-nuts/</link>
	<description>What are the nuts thinking?</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 02:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: eric</title>
		<link>http://investornuts.wordpress.com/2008/04/24/is-this-minning-stock-just-nuts/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investornuts.wordpress.com/?p=10#comment-7</guid>
		<description>31x nobody is using 2007s numbers anymore... Something rather substantial has happened in the mining and ore markets over the past year...

Most buysiders are using $6.75-7.00 for 2009.  Recaulculate at that eps and factor in a pretty good qoq &#38; yoy growth rates, you will see a stock that is not overvalued as you claim....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>31x nobody is using 2007s numbers anymore&#8230; Something rather substantial has happened in the mining and ore markets over the past year&#8230;</p>
<p>Most buysiders are using $6.75-7.00 for 2009.  Recaulculate at that eps and factor in a pretty good qoq &amp; yoy growth rates, you will see a stock that is not overvalued as you claim&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
